Why selective screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is currently appropriate: a special report.

INTRODUCTION: Two of the main reasons recent guidelines do not recommend routine population-wide screening programs for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) is that screening could lead to an increase of carotid revascularization procedures and that such mass screening programs may not be cost-effective. Nevertheless, selective screening for AsxCS could have several benefits. This article presents the rationale for such a program. AREAS COVERED: The benefits of selective screening for AsxCS include early recognition of AsxCS allowing timely initiation of preventive measures to reduce future myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac death and cardiovascular (CV) event rates. EXPERT OPINION: Mass screening programs for AsxCS are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Nevertheless, targeted screening of populations at high risk for AsxCS provides an opportunity to identify these individuals earlier rather than later and to initiate a number of lifestyle measures, risk factor modifications, and intensive medical therapy in order to prevent future strokes and CV events. For patients at 'higher risk of stroke' on best medical treatment, a prophylactic carotid intervention may be considered.

Recent advances and controversial issues in the optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) is enduringly controversial. We updated our 2021 Expert Review and Position Statement, focusing on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with AsxCS. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed up to August 1, 2023, using PubMed/PubMed Central, EMBASE and Scopus. The following keywords were used in various combinations: "asymptomatic carotid stenosis," "carotid endarterectomy" (CEA), "carotid artery stenting" (CAS), and "transcarotid artery revascularization" (TCAR). Areas covered included (i) improvements in best medical treatment (BMT) for patients with AsxCS and declining stroke risk, (ii) technological advances in surgical/endovascular skills/techniques and outcomes, (iii) risk factors, clinical/imaging characteristics and risk prediction models for the identification of high-risk AsxCS patient subgroups, and (iv) the association between cognitive dysfunction and AsxCS. RESULTS: BMT is essential for all patients with AsxCS, regardless of whether they will eventually be offered CEA, CAS, or TCAR. Specific patient subgroups at high risk for stroke despite BMT should be considered for a carotid revascularization procedure. These patients include those with severe (≥80%) AsxCS, transcranial Doppler-detected microemboli, plaque echolucency on Duplex ultrasound examination, silent infarcts on brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography scans, decreased cerebrovascular reserve, increased size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area, AsxCS progression, carotid plaque ulceration, and intraplaque hemorrhage. Treatment of patients with AsxCS should be individualized, taking into consideration individual patient preferences and needs, clinical and imaging characteristics, and cultural, ethnic, and social factors. Solid evidence supporting or refuting an association between AsxCS and cognitive dysfunction is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal management of patients with AsxCS should include BMT for all individuals and a prophylactic carotid revascularization procedure (CEA, CAS, or TCAR) for some asymptomatic patient subgroups, additionally taking into consideration individual patient needs and preference, clinical and imaging characteristics, social and cultural factors, and the available stroke risk prediction models. Future studies should investigate the association between AsxCS with cognitive function and the role of carotid revascularization procedures in the progression or reversal of cognitive dysfunction.

An international, multispecialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document on controversial issues in the management of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the publication of various national/international guidelines, several questions concerning the management of patients with asymptomatic (AsxCS) and symptomatic (SxCS) carotid stenosis remain unanswered. The aim of this international, multi-specialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document was to address these issues to help clinicians make decisions when guidelines are unclear. METHODS: Fourteen controversial topics were identified. A three-round Delphi Consensus process was performed including 61 experts. The aim of Round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions regarding these unresolved topics. In Round 2, clarifications were asked from each participant. In Round 3, the questionnaire was resent to all participants for their final vote. Consensus was reached when ≥75% of experts agreed on a specific response. RESULTS: Most experts agreed that: (1) the current periprocedural/in-hospital stroke/death thresholds for performing a carotid intervention should be lowered from 6% to 4% in patients with SxCS and from 3% to 2% in patients with AsxCS; (2) the time threshold for a patient being considered "recently symptomatic" should be reduced from the current definition of "6 months" to 3 months or less; (3) 80% to 99% AsxCS carries a higher risk of stroke compared with 60% to 79% AsxCS; (4) factors beyond the grade of stenosis and symptoms should be added to the indications for revascularization in AsxCS patients (eg, plaque features of vulnerability and silent infarctions on brain computed tomography scans); and (5) shunting should be used selectively, rather than always or never. Consensus could not be reached on the remaining topics due to conflicting, inadequate, or controversial evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The present international, multi-specialty expert-based Delphi Consensus document attempted to provide responses to several unanswered/unresolved issues. However, consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting areas requiring future research.

Inflammation Is a Histological Characteristic of Skeletal Muscle in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The loss of skeletal muscle is a prognostic factor in several diseases including in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients with CLTI also have a lower skeletal mass and area when compared to those with claudication. However, there are no currently available data regarding the histological characteristics of core muscles in patients with CLTI. This study aims to determine the differences in core skeletal muscles between patients with claudication and those with CLTI. The second aim is to evaluate the differences in myokines, which are molecules secreted by skeletal muscle, between patients with claudication and those with CLTI. METHODS: An observational, prospective study was conducted from January 2018 to July 2022 involving consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The clinical characteristics were registered. In PAD patients with surgical indication for common femoral artery approach, samples of sartorius skeletal muscle (and not from the limb muscles directly involved in the ischemic process) were collected. The samples were submitted to histological characterization on hematoxylin-eosin and to immunohistochemical analysis to detect CD45+ leukocytes and CD163+ macrophages. The extent of the inflammatory cells (leukocytes and macrophages) was semiquantitatively assessed using a 0-to-4 grade scale as follows: absent (0†), mild (†), moderate (††), severe (†††), and very severe (††††). Serum levels of myokines: irisin, myostatin, IL-8, and lL-6 were determined with multiplex bead-based immunoassay. RESULTS: 119 patients (mean age: 67.58 ± 9.60 years old, 79.80% males) 64 with claudication and 54 with CLTI were enrolled in the study. No differences were registered between patients with claudication and those with CLTI on age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and medication, except on smoking habits. There was a significantly higher prevalence of smokers and a higher smoking load in the claudication group. Samples of sartorius skeletal muscle from 40 patients (14 with claudication and 26 with CLTI) were submitted to histological analysis. No differences were found in skeletal muscle fibers preservation, trauma, or hemorrhage (on hematoxylin-eosin staining). However, in the immunohistochemistry study, we found more inflammatory cells CD45+ leukocytes in patients with CLTI when compared to those with claudication [CD45+ ≥ moderate (††): claudication (n = 14): 4; 28.57%; CLTI (n = 25): 16; 64.00%; P = 0.034]. Patients with CLTI also had higher tissue levels of CD163+ macrophages, but this difference was not significant [CD163+ ≥ moderate (††): claudication (n = 13): 7; 53.85%; CLTI (n = 27): 21; 77.78%; P = 0.122]. The serum levels of the myokines, irisin, and myostatin were below the lower limit of detection, in the majority of patients, so no valid results were obtained. However, patients with CLTI had a higher serum level of Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. CONCLUSIONS: CLTI patients exhibit increased quantities of leukocytes in their sartorius muscle, as well as elevated serum levels of myokines IL-8 and IL-6. Inflamed skeletal muscle can contribute to the loss of muscle mass and account for the lower density of skeletal muscle observed in CLTI. Additionally, inflamed skeletal muscle may contribute to the development of systemic inflammation through the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines into the systemic circulation. Halting the inflammatory process could eventually improve the prognosis of CLTI patients.

PREVAIT after modern open surgery and endothermal ablation: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Presence of varices after operative treatment (PREVAIT) is a common finding after varicose vein surgery, and has been shown to significantly reduce the quality of life of those it affects. As such, long-term results after varicose vein interventions have to be taken into account when choosing a technique. This study aims to systematically review current evidence on the recurrence of varicose veins after three different techniques: conventional surgery (HLS), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 546 studies. Fourteen studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 2795 patients were included, for a total of 3056 legs treated. 503 legs (16.5%) were treated by HLS, 1791 (58.6%) by EVLA and 762 (25.0%) by RFA. PREVAIT was reported in 34.4% for patients treated by HLS, for a mean follow-up comprised between 18 months and 5 years; 16.6% by EVLA, for a mean follow-up between 112 days and 5 years and 6.7% of those treated by RFA, for a mean follow-up between 106 days and 5 years. Regarding patterns of recurrence, the development of new varicose veins was the most commonly reported mechanism of recurrence after HLS (range: 29.8-91%) and EVLA (range: 40-81.6%), but not RFA, where recanalization of the occluded saphenous trunk accounted for up to 67.0% of the cases. Only one study reported quality of life related recurrence, and included patients treated by HLS and EVLA, but not RFA. Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, physical functioning domains of the SF-36 score and patient satisfaction were significantly worse in patients with clinical recurrence. Re-intervention rates after recurrence were reported in 5 studies, ranging between 7.7% and 37.7% for HLS and 0-57.0% for EVLA. Only one study reported data on re-intervention for RFA patients, which was 6.67%. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence is a reliable indicator of long-term efficacy of a varicose vein treatment and appears to occur more frequently after HLS. Although there are several mechanisms of recurrence, the development of new varicose veins was the most commonly observed. There is clear heterogeneity among definitions of recurrence and follow-up periods in literature.

Exploring the Diversity of Visceral, Subcutaneous and Perivascular Adipose Tissue in a Vascular Surgery Population.

The prevalence of obesity has doubled, with a concomitant increase in cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of visceral, subcutaneous and peri-aortic adipose tissue determined with computed tomography (CT) scans and to correlate them with cardiovascular risk factors, anthropometric measures and medication. An observational and prospective study was conducted, and 177 subjects were included. Peri-aortic adipose tissue had the highest density, while the subcutaneous adipose tissue had the lowest. The density of subcutaneous adipose tissue differs from the density of visceral (p = 0.00) and peri-aortic adipose tissue (p = 0.00). Smokers/ex-smokers had a lower area (p = 0.00) and density (p = 0.02) of subcutaneous adipose tissue. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that sex was a predictor of subcutaneous adipose tissue area (ß = -0.27, t = -3.12, p = 0.00) but smoking habits were not. After controlling for sex, we found that the association between smokers/ex-smokers and area of subcutaneous adipose tissue was lost, but the association with density persisted. Patients with hypertension had a higher visceral adipose tissue area, and this relationship was maintained even after adjusting for gender. Peri-aortic adipose tissue is similar to visceral and distinct from subcutaneous adipose tissue. Cardiovascular risk factors have different influences in distinct adipose compartments.

A Delphi Consensus Study on Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy: Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, evidence is lacking for disease specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (either symptomatic or asymptomatic) submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to obtain expert consensus on the most important items to include in a PROM designed to capture the impact of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis and its treatment on health related quality of life. METHODS: A three round modified Delphi consensus study was performed. A mixed expert Delphi panel of doctors (international panel of dedicated vascular surgeons and neurologists) and patients (either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients meeting criteria for carotid artery revascularisation) was implemented. The aim was to obtain pre-defined consensus on items in four pre-defined domains: generic, quality of life, symptom related, and treatment related. Consensus was reached in rounds two and three with > 70% overall expert agreement. RESULTS: The experts agreed on 23 items (out of 49) which were distributed as follows: five in the generic, six in the quality of life, six in the symptom, and six in the treatment related domain. Interestingly, comparing the items that reached consensus in this study, with the generic and disease specific PROMs previously used in carotid artery disease investigation, the only constant items were "difficulty with walking" and "ability to perform daily activities" included in the symptom domain. Considering the items that reached expert consensus in the additional domains, emphasis was given to the impact of the diagnosis, treatment and follow up, and to fear or concern "about the future" and "about severe stroke". In the treatment domain emphasis was also attained on the side effects, long term patient satisfaction, and on the information provided regarding treatment options. DISCUSSION: As hard clinical outcomes become increasingly rare, assessment of the impact of CEA becomes increasingly difficult. The consensus reached provides a newly defined disease specific PROM that warrants independent validation in specific populations in the future.

Inflammation and Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic disease of the lower extremities. Atherosclerosis, inflammation, and sarcopenia are independently associated and potentiate each other. Inflammation is deeply involved in the formation and progression of atherosclerosis and is also involved in the pathophysiology of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is defined as low muscle mass, with low muscle strength. This study aims to determine the differences in skeletal muscle characteristics and in inflammatory parameters between patients with claudication and with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: An observational, prospective study in patients with PAD was conducted from January 2018 to December 2020. The clinical characteristics and the cardiovascular risk factors were prospectively registered. The inflammatory parameters determined were: positive acute phase proteins (C-reactive Protein- CRP- and fibrinogen) and negative acute phase proteins albumin, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The skeletal muscle area and density were quantified with a computed topography (CT) scan. The strength was determined with a Jamar® hydraulic hand dynamometer. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (mean age: 67.65 ± 9.53 years-old) 64% with claudication and 46% with CLTI were enrolled in the study. No differences were registered between patients with claudication and CLTI on age, cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking habits) and medication. There was a higher prevalence of men in the claudication group (88.89% vs. 71.70%, P = 0.019). Analyzing the inflammatory parameters, we noted that patients with CLTI had increased serum levels of positive acute phase proteins: CRP (37.53 ± 46.61 mg/L vs. 9.18 ± 26.12 mg/L, P = 0.000), and fibrinogen (466.18 ± 208.07 mg/dL vs. 317.37 ± 79.42 mg/dL, P = 0.000). CLTI patients had decreased negative acute phase proteins: albumin (3.53 ± 0.85 g/dL vs. 3.91 ± 0.72 g/dL, P = 0.001), total cholesterol (145.41 ± 38.59 mg/dL vs. 161.84 ± 34.94 mg/dL, P = 0.013) and HDL (38.70 ± 12.19 mg/dL vs. 51.31 ± 15.85 mg/dL, P = 0.000). We noted that patients with CLTI had lower skeletal muscle area and mass (14,349.77 ± 3,036.60 mm2 vs. 15,690.56 ± 3,183.97 mm2P = 0.013; 10.11 ± 17.03HU vs. 18.02 ± 13.63HU P = 0.013). After adjusting for the variable sex, the association between skeletal muscle density and CLTI persisted (r (97) = -0.232, P = 0.021). The groups did not differ in strength (patients with claudication: 25.39 ± 8.23 Kgf vs. CLTI: 25.17 ± 11.95 Kgf P = 0.910). CONCLUSIONS: CLTI patients have decreased skeletal muscle mass and a systemic inflammation status. Recognizing the deleterious triad of atherosclerosis, inflammation and loss of skeletal mass patients with CLTI is an opportunity to improve medical therapy and to perform a timely intervention to stop this vicious cycle.

Why do guidelines recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, but not for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A plea for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended. METHODS: A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS. RESULTS: Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk individuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification. CONCLUSIONS: Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.

Chemothromboprophylaxis in varicose vein surgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a possible complication after varicose vein surgery, reported after both open and endovascular interventions. Nonetheless, there are no internationally accepted recommendations regarding postoperative VTE prevention strategies, with some authors advocating for its use, while others recommend against it. This study aims to systematically review current evidence on the efficacy and safety of chemothromboprophylactic strategies after varicose vein surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE, Scopus, SciELO and Web of Science databases, which returned 532 studies. Ten studies were included. Data were extracted using piloted forms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 6929 patients were included for analysis, out of which 70.4% were treated by open surgery (N.=4878) and 29.6% by endovenous procedures (N.=2051; 79.1% EVLA; 20.9% RFA). VTE chemothromboprophylaxis was performed in 76.3% of the patients (N.=5284), from which 62.5% were treated by open surgery (N.=3301) and 37.5% by endovenous interventions (N.=1983). Among those treated by open surgery, reported deep venous thrombosis (DVT) rates ranged between 0-6.25%, while pulmonary embolism (PE) was reported in 0-0.07% of the cases. Regarding endovenous interventions, EHIT and DVT rates ranged between 0-2.5% and 0-0.9%, respectively, with no cases of PE described. The remaining 23.7% of the patients did not underwent VTE chemothromboprophylaxis (N.=1645), with DVT and PE rates after open surgery ranging between 0-5.17% and 0-1.48%, respectively. Only one study reported thrombotic complications after endovenous interventions in this subgroup of patients, with postoperative EHIT rates of 7.3%, and no information regarding PE or DVT. Bleeding complications were higher in patients undergoing chemothromboprophylaxis (0-10.2%) when compared to those who did not (0-0.18%), and were more frequent after endovenous interventions (0-10.2% versus 0-0.75% after open surgery). CONCLUSIONS: VTE is a possible complication after both open and endovascular varicose vein procedures, although overall VTE complications occur less frequently after endovascular interventions. There's a clear heterogeneity regarding peri and postoperative chemoprophylaxis regimens used. Further studies are required to stratify risk factors and indications for chemothromboprophylaxis after varicose vein surgery.

Comparison of Recent Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Despite the publication of several national/international guidelines, the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) remains controversial. This article compares 3 recently released guidelines (the 2020 German-Austrian, the 2021 European Stroke Organization [ESO], and the 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery [SVS] guidelines) vs the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines regarding the optimal management of AsxCS patients.The 2017 ESVS guidelines defined specific imaging/clinical parameters that may identify patient subgroups at high future stroke risk and recommended that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should or carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be considered for these individuals. The 2020 German-Austrian guidelines provided similar recommendations with the 2017 ESVS Guidelines. The 2021 ESO Guidelines also recommended CEA for AsxCS patients at high risk for stroke on best medical treatment (BMT), but recommended against routine use of CAS in these patients. Finally, the SVS guidelines provided a strong recommendation for CEA+BMT vs BMT alone for low-surgical risk patients with >70% AsxCS. Thus, the ESVS, German-Austrian, and ESO guidelines concurred that all AsxCS patients should receive risk factor modification and BMT, but CEA should or CAS may also be considered for certain AsxCS patient subgroups at high risk for future ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Association of Skeletal Muscle and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is defined as low muscle mass, with low muscle strength or low physical performance. The skeletal muscle mass (or density) and strength are inversely associated with cardiovascular risk factors. We aim to determine the relationship between skeletal muscle characteristics (strength, mass, area), and cardiovascular risk factors in a population with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). METHODS: An observational, prospective study including patients with LEAD was conducted from January 2018 to December 2020. The cardiovascular risk factors and anthropometric measurements were prospectively registered. The skeletal muscle characteristics (area, density/mass and strength) were analysed. The skeletal muscle area and density were quantified with a CT scan. The strength was determined with a Jamar® hydraulic hand dynamometer. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients with LEAD with 67.70 ± 10.11 years-old were enrolled in the study. The most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor was hypertension, followed by dyslipidemia and diabetes. Patients with diabetes had a lower handgrip strength and skeletal muscle density, when compared with patients without diabetes (strength: 19.67 ± 9.98 kgf vs. 26.79 ± 11.80 kgf, P = 0.002 and skeletal muscle density: 10.58 ± 17.61 HU vs. 18.17 ± 15.33 HU, P = 0.032). There was a trend for the association between the presence of cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and dyslipidemia) and a decrease in skeletal muscle density and strength (density: hypertension: 13.46 ± 16.74 HU vs. 20.38 ± 11.63 HU P=0.055; dyslipidemia: 13.57 ± 17.16 HU vs. 17.74 ± 13.00 HU P= 0.315; strength- hypertension: 22.55 ± 10.08 kgf vs. 27.58 ± 15.11 P= 0.073; dyslipidemia: 22.80 ± 10.52 kgf vs. 25.28 ± 13.14 kgf P= 0.315). Interestingly, we found that smokers had a favorable skeletal muscle characteristic, which could be explained by the higher prevalence of diabetes in nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: The indicators of skeletal muscle dysfunction (strength and density) are associated to the presence of diabetes in patients with LEAD. Therapeutic strategies to improve the skeletal muscle characteristics could have a role in improving LEAD risk factors, particularly diabetes.

Critical analysis of the literature and standards of reporting on stroke after carotid revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanisms of procedural stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting are surprisingly underresearched. However, understanding the underlying mechanism could (1) assist in balancing the choice for revascularization vs conservative therapy, (2) assist in choosing either open or endovascular techniques, and (3) assist in taking appropriate periprocedural measures to further decrease procedural stroke rate. The purpose of this study was to overview mechanisms of procedural stroke after carotid revascularization and establish reporting standards to facilitate more granular investigation and individual patient data meta-analysis in the future. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: The limited evidence in the literature was heterogeneous and of low quality. Thus, no formal data meta-analysis could be performed. Procedural stroke was classified as hemorrhagic or ischemic; the latter was subclassified as hemodynamic, embolic (carotid embolic or cardioembolic) or carotid occlusion derived, using a combination of clinical inference and imaging data. Most events occurred in the first 24 hours after the procedure and were related to hypoperfusion (pooled incidence 10.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-17.5] vs 13.9% [95% CI, 0.0-60.9] after CEA vs carotid artery stenting events, respectively) or atheroembolism (28.9% [95% CI, 10.9-47.0]) vs 34.3 [95% CI, 0.0-91.5]). After the first 24 hours, hemorrhagic stroke (11.6 [95% CI, 5.7-17.4] vs 9.0 [95% CI, 1.3-16.7]) or thrombotic occlusion (18.4 [95% CI, 0.9-35.8] vs 14.8 [95% CI, 0.0-30.5]) became more likely. CONCLUSIONS: Although procedural stroke incidence and etiology may have changed over the last decades owing to technical improvements and improvements in perioperative monitoring and quality control, the lack of literature data limits further statements. To simplify and enhance future reporting, procedural stroke analysis and classification should be documented preemptively in research settings. We propose a standardized form enclosing reporting standards for procedural stroke with a systematic approach to inference of the most likely etiology, for prospective use in registries and randomized controlled trials on carotid revascularization.